FORGING AHEAD: "Crippled Epistemologies"
In case you missed it, fellow Vermonter Marc Estrin wrote an article on Obama's new "Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs," one Cass Sunstein by name. Sunstein recently penned a most interesting paper concerning "Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures." In an ongoing effort to enlighten what I personally see as the "epistemologically crippled," I'd like to offer some "cognitive diversity," of my own...
The only real cure for "conspiracy theories," would be an end to conspiring on the part of the bankers, the corporations, the American federal government and additionally, several notable foreign entities. It's entirely laughable that the events of 9-11 should be front and center to Sunstein's paper, given that none other than John Farmer, the former Senior Counsel to the American government's own 9-11 Commission, has written a book in which he states that the government lied to the commission at every level and he no longer believes the commission's own report.
It therefore behooves us to inquire, or in the parlance of the day, "theorize," as to who decided ("conspired," if you will,) to deceive the 9-11 Commission, and more importantly, ask why they did it. It behooves us, in fact, as Sunstein suggests, to expand our "...sharply limited number of (relevant) informational sources." Odd then, that Sunstein seems to actually be advocating the limiting of inquiry and the redirecting of it toward official, government sources. You know, like the 9-11 Commission... though maybe not the likes of John Farmer and his new book.
But that's Newspeak for you.
~
On the subject of inquiry... I personally read and very much enjoy reading things that I disagree with. Vermont Commons itself often being no exception. I am thusly challenged to question previously held beliefs, some of which change and some of which become further emboldened as a result. Isn't that the value of discussion, of ideas, of critical thinking and yes, even "cognitive diversity"? Should we instead congratulate ourselves for being "smart people," and simply listen to the echoes of agreement? There are some, even in the Politically Correct Vermont "blogosphere," who loudly proclaim their "tolerant" nature and yet have absolutely no compunction whatsoever in loudly and quite personally deriding those who engage in free inquiry. They frequently get their basic facts so wrong that one wonders what, exactly, they are up to, if anything at all. I hesitate to postulate on any decisions that may or may not have been made without the benefit of full public discourse; after all, I'm not some "conspiracy theorist," or anything. I am, however, inclined to think that some of these individuals quite likely know full well that they're being less than honest and some of them simply enjoy the moral panic, the Two Minutes Hate, the "cognitive infiltration," or whatever it is that's going on.
I have one piece of advice for these folks: try some crochet. A little work with the hands does the mind wonders.