Vermont Commons

Skip to content

Vermont Commons

Voices of Independence


Jacqueline Brook: Beam It In

Beam It In

By Jacqueline Brook

“Unlike PSYOP, MindWar has nothing to do with deception or even with “selected”—and therefore misleading—truth. Rather, it states a whole truth that, if it does not now exist, will be forced into existence by the will of the United States. . . . Infrasound vibration (up to 20 Hz) can subliminally influence brain activity . . . Infrasound could be used tactically, as ELF waves endure for great distances; and it could be used in conjunction with media broadcasts as well.”

Col. Paul Vallely and Maj. Michael Aquino, PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory

“One of the research areas for HAARP [High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program] will be the study of methods and techniques for the generation of extremely low frequencies (ELF) through ionospheric heating. The following pages provide background on the value of this important frequency range to the Navy, how an ionospheric heater might be used to produce ELF signals.”
www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/elfindex.html

In the introduction to his MindWar proposal (which can be found at www.xeper.org, the official website of the Temple of Set), former military intelligence–guy Michael Aquino says he was fascinated to see that some of his MindWar “prescriptions” had been applied during the first Gulf War and “even more obviously during the 2003 invasion of Iraq.”

So, on the morning of September 11, 2001, when CIA Director George Tenet was having breakfast with David Boren (former Oklahoma Democratic Senator) and was informed that a plane had struck the World Trade Center and said (before the end of the meal), “This is bin Laden. His fingerprints are all over it,” was that a currently true truth? Or a future truth—one that would be “forced into existence by the will of the United States”? And when, merely a few days later, all the talking heads on TV were repeating that bin Laden had done it, was the whole world being bombarded with ELF signals?

Well, actually, perhaps: “Shortly after the World Trade Center attack, and when the military went on highest DefCon Delta Alert, HAARP began transmitting during the day at maximum power on 6.965 MHz and could be heard by listeners around the world. The HAARP transmissions continued on and off on both 6.965 and 3.390 MHz at extremely high power both during the day and night. The transmission began on Tuesday, September 11, just several hours after the destruction of the World Trade Center and continued through early September 13.” (www.brojon.org/frontpage/bj091601.html)

“Early September 13” would've been the time most Americans finally tore themselves away from their TV sets.

One of the program managers for HAARP is the Air Force Research Laboratory, Space Vehicles Directorate, which overlaps with the Directed Energy Directorate. The AFRL also runs the Information Directorate, the mission of which (no surprise here) has to do with “information dominance.”
The Wright Research Site is part of the Information Directorate. Their home page (www.wrs.afrl.af.mil) has a very cool image on it of a black stealth aircraft in the midst of a cone-shaped beam, surrounded by seven squiggly lines (the kind that might be produced by a pen in a lie-detector machine), one in each of the seven colors of the rainbow. The image seems potentially illustrative of a “holographic projector.” National security expert William Arkin has written that the Air Force began working on a device as wild as that “for PSYOPS application” in 1994. “‘What if the U.S. projected a holographic image of Allah floating over Baghdad urging the Iraqi people and Army to rise up against Saddam, a senior Air Force officer asked in 1990?'” A military physicist looked into it and deemed it feasible. Much easier would have been another plan that proposed flooding the Arab world with fake videotapes of Saddam Hussein in compromising situations. (www.voxfux.com/archives/00000055.htm)
Hmmm . . . all those bin Laden videotapes . . . Oh, conspiracy-shmiracy, you'll say.

Well, here's a personal story: Dr. Carol Rosin, the President of the Institute for Cooperation in Space, relates that, in 1977, when she worked at Fairchild Industries, she attended a meeting there in a conference room called the War Room. There “were a lot of charts on the walls with enemies, identified enemies. There were other more obscure names, names like Saddam Hussein and Khadafi.” The conversation revolved around “how they were going to antagonize these enemies” to provoke “a war in the Gulf, a Gulf War.” It was part of a plan to justify the development of space-based weapons at a time when the term “Strategic Defense Initiative” had not even been coined yet. According to Rosin, “The room was filled with people in the revolving door game. There were people that I had seen once in a military uniform and other times in a gray suit and an industry outfit. . . . I stood up in this meeting and asked if I was hearing correctly. . . . that there was going to be a war in the Gulf, stimulated, created, so that they could then sell the next phase of weapons to the public and the decision-makers. This war was going to be created so that they could dump the old weapons and create a whole new set of weapons.”
Werner von Braun, the “father” of our space and rocket programs, served at the end of his life as mentor to Carol.

According to Rosin, von Braun outlined to her over and over again the entire implausible multi-act play designed to sell us weapons in space, asserting that the first act—the first hoax—had been the Cold War. (Carol's story can be found in Dr. Steven Greer's book Disclosure.)
Fast forward: The title of David Ray Griffin's first book on 9/11, The New Pearl Harbor, was taken from a report put out in September of 2000 by the think tank Project For The New American Century, entitled “Rebuilding America's Defenses.” (PNAC's Statement of Principles is signed by the likes of Jeb Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz.) The relevant passage reads, “The process of transformation [of America's military forces], even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor.” Additionally, a report issued in January of 2001 by a commission chaired by Donald Rumsfeld asked "whether the U.S. will be wise enough to act responsibly and soon enough to reduce U.S. space vulnerability—without a ‘Space Pearl Harbor.'” Was it merely coincidence that, according to Griffin, on 9/11/01 George W. Bush wrote in his diary, “The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today”? Or was it exactly the problem that had been called for to induce a solution conceived decades earlier—a “forced” truth?

The authors of "Rebuilding America's Defenses" call for the birth of a new service under the command of the Defense Department—U.S. Space Forces—to maintain our “unequivocal supremacy in space” by the “ability to deny others the use of space” and by “the application of force both in space and from space.” No kidding. According to Rosin, this is the path we were already well upon—unbeknownst to all but the most elite—back in 1977, during the midst of her brief stint in the military-industrial complex.

Imagine Dick Cheney or Donald Rumsfeld as Commander-in-Chief of U.S. Space Forces. Where would they locate border patrol then, I wonder? And what kind of aliens would be illegal? That's right! According to the script that von Braun saw, ETs are slated to become a global menace. They'll be capable of interplanetary and interdimensional travel—and they'll enter, stage left, to play the role of next dreaded enemy with impeccable timing, no doubt. (Here's where the “holographic projector” probably comes in. Or maybe ETs will intervene to prevent Cheney from dropping nuclear weapons on Iran—thank you very much!—and the new “they're evil; they hate freedom” drumbeat will begin.)
There's something rather abstract (not to mention absurd and utterly offensive) about waging a war in and from space. What might be needed to get Americans finally to fully buy into such madness? Well, the events of 9/11 catapulted us beautifully into this current quite abstract War on Terror, didn't they?

So. Is it real? Or is it Memorex?

Login or register to post comments



ADVERTISEMENT



All content on this site & copy (2006-2010) by each individual author. CREATIVE COMMONS license applies for republishing - please contact publisher Rob Williams for details.